Life of Pi Journal Response

The narrator of this book has his avow view ab step forward zoos. He tries to bring on it seem as if his view is absolutely true and is scientifi exclaimy proven and that he is 100% politic every(prenominal)y correct. According to him a zoo to an animal is like a home to a military man. But I totally dis grant with his view on the zoos. In the book the narrators view is totally opposite. He assumes and leaden offs that holding animals in batting detains is normal to them and they dont mind He persuades us to think that animals are perfectly fine and go out it normal to be kept in confines Animals like organism in the very(prenominal) cages, its like their home, There is no point like home?Thats certainly what animals feel. According to him animals would rather profit out in a restricted state where his raw material replication aways are met than bouncing in an open area across-the-board of enemies and no guarantee of food. He is reflexion that a cage is an anima ls home How peck that be come-at-able? How tummy an animal call around cage where its been stuck for perpetually and ever where it cant go some(prenominal)where, call it home?? It seems as if the narrator I personally do non agree with the narrators view about zoos or any other enclosed dwelling for animals. We all human beings k promptly that animals do non like being kept in cages and in enclosed enclosures. Animals are territorial.That is the profound to their minds. Only a familiar territorial exit allow them to process the twain relentless imperatives of the angry the avoidance of enemies and the acquiring of food and water. So biologically sound zoo enclosure whether cage, pit, moated island, corral, terrarium, aviary or aquarium- is honest another land In a zoo, we do for animals what we reserve done for ourselves with houses Now he is canvas the animals cages to our homes How is it possible to compare an animals cage to our houses? They are definitely imm ensely different.We cannot possibly compare a indue like our home to an animals cage. Animals are meant to run in the wild in the forests, the desserts etc. Thats their home. comparable our homes are our habitats in cities and country sides. Its not possible to call a cage, an animals grunge its like a jail for him. A house is a compresses territory where basic needs can be carry through close by and safely (with the celebrated absence of a fireplace or the like, present in every human habitation).Finding within it all the places it needs- a lookout, a place for resting, for eating and drinking, for bathing, for grooming-etc. nd finding that there is no need to go hunting, food appearing cardinal days a week, an animal will take possession of its zoo home in the same way it would coiffure claim I discord with the feature that the cages are the animals territory and home. Just because the cage can fulfill the basic needs (resting, look out, eating, and bathing) that doesnt mean its territory. The animal is being compel to live in the cages and so it has to hide with the situation and cope with it. Where he says execute by close by and safely he is wrong. The bars around the cage arent for safety for the animals but for merely keeping it inside its cage.Its a safety for us How does this even make sense in the first place? Its basically saying that, mortal a human is forced to live in a cage where he/she will be supplied with food and occupation that cage their home Their safe, have a place to eat, rest, lookout Its the humans territory and home now because it will conciliate there forcefully until it dies You can also look at this like this. You see a madam bug crawling around. So you take a blow and cover it atop it. You give it food/water fooling So basically now the jar is its home sweet home and its feature territory? Thats what the narrator is basically saying.I disagree with the fact that animals can be compared to humans. The narra tor cannot simply just start comparing humans lifestyles to animals. How can we possibly sleep to personateher whether the cage is like a home to the animals? The animals function in nature they have their sustain habitats and their own ways of having a convenient lifestyle. How can we say that a cage is a comfortable area and a home to an animal? We do not know what animals think, we dont know what they are saying Even though we see the animals in their enclosures all cool and quite we cannot simply assume that they come it.Its like we were separated from our families and point in a cage to stay humanness and animals are very different. Humans are able to do things that animals cant They can build houses out of nature (with wood etc). Animals are limited. They get raised and are taught to hunt so they can eat and live In conclusion I defiantly do not agree with the narrator on the fact that animals love the zoo, and like being kept in cages/enclosures. I disagree with his v iew and opinion on zoos.